Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 14:04
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 279
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 860
84% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 168
Parallax 158
82% 142 fps
MRender 90.3
Gravity 113
Splatting 78.9
76% 94 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$62
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,454
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,573
456% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 83.7
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 979
724% 954 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
185GB free
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1106 574 566 423 470 518 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,045
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,155
SusWrite 609
235% 1,043 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 55.8
195% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,074
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 891
678% 920 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 181%
Great: 251%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
164GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 186 182 181 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 183
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 182
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake R019D408GX2-3200C16A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback