Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ef2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 01:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 199
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 497
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 15.2
7% 12.1 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11
Splatting 13.9
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 378 362 438 429 338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 891
Write 760
Mixed 742
SusWrite 378
155% 692 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 27.5
97% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 198
166% 250 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.4% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 23 60 21.7" 1920 1009 SAC952D LED MONITOR
Typical Laptop 15-ef2xxx Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback