Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 259%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 17 '24 at 15:25
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$214
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 194
2-Core 404
117% 227 Pts
4-Core 798
8-Core 1,509
138% 1,154 Pts
64-Core 2,279
141% 2,279 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 305
Reflection 300
Parallax 324
248% 310 fps
MRender 336
Gravity 245
Splatting 183
200% 255 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 206%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2980 818 818 851 856 852 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 3,001
Write 3,777
Mixed 3,192
SusWrite 1,196
629% 2,791 MB/s
4K Read 85.7
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 121
402% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,416
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 1,249
941% 1,265 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 375%
Great: 464%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
141GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 245 241 239 235 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 265
Mixed 284
SusWrite 252
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 40.2
156% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 246
198% 281 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 133%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
263GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 84 100 100 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,515
Write 1,426
Mixed 1,093
SusWrite 198
236% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 88.1
315% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 274
358% 635 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 206%
Great: 299%
Ct2000p3
296GB free
Firmware: 5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 394 394 394 385 382 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 369
Write 397
Mixed 384
SusWrite 391
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 33.2
108% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 186
135% 174 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 218 221 218 216 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 123%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
43GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 101 87 108 112 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 108
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$85
782GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 98 95 96 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 95.2
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 35.9
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 30.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 3R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 29% 28 212 57 144 27" 1920 1080 ACR0628 ED273 A
History: Score 20: 0P 3R 0G 5B | Score 33: 0P 3R 5G 3B
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 231%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,081
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback