| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B84 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191202 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 17 '24 at 13:09 |
| Run Duration | 248 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 52% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67%
Good
|
66% 125 Pts
|
58% 435 Pts
|
27% 432 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B84) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
|
3.54%
Terrible
|
0% 10.7 fps
|
10% 12 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$79
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 131 132 121 141 MB/s
|
70.1%
Very good
|
70% 97.9 MB/s
|
122% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905734-018.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.2%
Poor
|
26% 9.1 GB/s
|
26% 9.13 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 75 | 27" | 1280 720 | PHLC156 PHL 273V7 |
Typical A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 112 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $75Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 22x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 14x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 10x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $300 |