Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics280% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '24 at 18:56
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$511
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 195
2-Core 389
119% 226 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,348
126% 1,049 Pts
64-Core 1,796
111% 1,796 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.10.16
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
280% Outstanding
Lighting 371
Reflection 494
Parallax 844
302% 570 fps
MRender 556
Gravity 291
Splatting 486
366% 445 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 280%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,857
Write 3,740
Mixed 2,420
605% 2,672 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.8
214% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,742
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 697
717% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 517%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.6
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.7
11% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42U5.M16G1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 75.5
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 65
189% 66.1 GB/s
SC Read 64.3
SC Write 57.3
SC Mixed 53.7
167% 58.4 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 182%
Great: 183%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 LEN66F2 G32qc-30
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 277%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $1,468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback