Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '24 at 20:15
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 137
50% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 238
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6081
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 36.9
27% 35.8 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 26.6
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 66 8.7 9 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 549
Write 163
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 47.3
45% 209 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 13.9
33% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 30.6
20% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 65%
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB
248GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 84 106 88 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 21.7" 1280 720 PSCCDD0 ParsecVDA
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback