Today's hottest deals

MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B53
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 12 '24 at 16:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 134
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 285
33% 256 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 34.1
30% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 26.7
26% 32.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 12 14 13 14 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 300
Write 38.3
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 28.6
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 9.1
48% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 15.2
12% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
488GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 159 158 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 160
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 158
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 21.5" 1920 1017 SAM0B3F S22D300
Typical B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback