Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240802
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '24 at 18:28
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G-$149
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 191
2-Core 346
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 829
87% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$267
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 114
Parallax 119
103% 120 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 85.4
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1862 1821 1856 2022 2142 2185 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,724
Write 2,258
Mixed 1,982
SusWrite 1,981
450% 1,986 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 62.7
217% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 701
524% 701 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 288%
Great: 417%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 115 126 127 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 126
Write 134
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 125
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72%
Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
798GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 104 104 108 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 108
Write 79.9
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 108
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 121 120 123 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 114
Write 121
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 121
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 75%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
405GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 29.6
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 34.5
46% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 25A3 20TB
15.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 51.9
Write 34.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 35.8
49% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.5
261% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 118%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1TB
930GB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 35 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 60.2
Write 26.7
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 35.2
46% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 43.3
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 42.4
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 43.8
127% 44.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 127%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 30 60 54.6" 1707 889 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 337%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback