Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 11 '24 at 16:10
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 245
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 68.2
59% 71.6 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 73
Splatting 68.2
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 175 75 61 97 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 383
Write 346
Mixed 318
SusWrite 115
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 19.7
95% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 144
126% 192 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
146GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 391 420 418 427 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 351
Write 431
Mixed 374
SusWrite 405
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 47
153% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$34
562GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 176 182 183 182 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 105
Write 123
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 180
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.6
446% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 34" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI MAG341CQ
Typical Z97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 1,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Anniversary - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback