Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS H710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB221
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 10 '24 at 10:28
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 144
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Fujitsu(10CF 1632) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.50
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 353 326 311 338 377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 302
Write 206
Mixed 276
SusWrite 352
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 19.4
68% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 172
141% 200 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 14.5" 1280 720 NVD0500 Nvidia Default Flat Panel
Typical CELSIUS H710 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback