Today's hottest deals

Asus CM6340

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAsus CM6340  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6340
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120829
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 10 '24 at 04:06
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 314
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 360
Sapphire(174B 1325) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.40
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 22
12% 20.4 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 22
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 124 142 156 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 154
Mixed 101
SusWrite 143
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
155GB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 28
Write 28.1
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 28.7
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27A1 VS278
Typical CM6340 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6340

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback