Today's hottest deals

Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '24 at 00:07
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 132
59% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 540
51% 422 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12029.10015
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 21.2
13% 21.3 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 21.4
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MCR-RPRS-480 480GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0630B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 87 24 218 40 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 446
Write 388
Mixed 370
SusWrite 133
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 17.3
82% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 28.3
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U22T3 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 40% 10 41 7 75 23.8" 1280 724 VIE2380 HORIZON Z24
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback