Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H67M-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H67M-ITX (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2560 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '24 at 23:39
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 158 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 267 33% 254 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 560.81 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 58.1 50% 60.7 fps	MRender 63.3 Gravity 63.4 Splatting 58.3 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89 1,360 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 349 402 326 156 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 202 Write 380 Mixed 267 SusWrite 275 64% 281 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 24.1 78% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 273 215% 295 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 100%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 126GB free Firmware: UJ870400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 24 19 32 42 86 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.6% Poor	Read 228 Write 87.7 Mixed 172 SusWrite 44.4 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 4.8 25% 7.9 MB/s	DQ Read 50.8 DQ Write 7.2 DQ Mixed 25 19% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 1,530 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	28.2"	1280 720	HWV6E22 MateView

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-ITX Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-ITX

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	5x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	5x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $115Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
Smartbuy 60GBSSDBench 51%, 259 samples	2x
Force GS 128GBCorsair $150Bench 74%, 5,048 samples	2x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 46%, 1,530 samples	3x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples	2x
M379B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 795 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400