Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory2.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 08 '24 at 02:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 153
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 445
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8392) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 26 19 21 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 27.6
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 21.2
135% 648 MB/s
4K Read 278
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.4
427% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 214%
Great: 141%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
471GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 189 210 202 193 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 383
Write 351
Mixed 330
SusWrite 195
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 28.1
92% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 315
238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM7094 LF24T450F
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback