Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '24 at 10:34
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 617
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 99.6
Parallax 63.8
60% 79 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 69
Splatting 58.3
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 924 669 468 471 467 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,103
Write 1,006
Mixed 959
SusWrite 647
209% 929 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 52.2
169% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 734
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 905
643% 813 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 170%
Great: 332%
Ultra M8V 512GB
223GB free
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 316 330 356 359 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 436
Mixed 426
SusWrite 338
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 41.2
145% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 302
230% 311 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 21.7" 1920 1017 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback