Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '24 at 14:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 838
84% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
Zotac(19DA 2630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 107
Parallax 107
91% 109 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 98.4
Splatting 80.5
81% 101 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 81 107 107 100 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 508
Write 383
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 113
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 29.8
138% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 31.3
94% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
568GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 198 201 199 199 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 166
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 199
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 27.2" 1280 720 BNQ7FA4 BenQ EX2710S
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $216Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback