Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '24 at 08:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$182
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 191
2-Core 389
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 769
8-Core 1,229
123% 999 Pts
64-Core 1,394
86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon PRO W7500
AMD(1002 0E0D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.40.02
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 136
Parallax 143
65% 120 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 157
114% 138 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 84%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,855
Write 3,712
Mixed 2,924
779% 3497 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 69.4
244% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 2,049
DQ Write 1,694
DQ Mixed 1,910
1,420% 1,884 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$117
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 60.4
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 61.1
178% 62.1 GB/s
SC Read 53
SC Write 61.3
SC Mixed 56.5
163% 56.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 171%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 HPN3462 HP E243i
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback