Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime4 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 08:32
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$499
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 175
2-Core 365
108% 207 Pts
4-Core 692
8-Core 1,166
113% 929 Pts
64-Core 1711
106% 1711 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 287
Parallax 314
253% 304 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 257
Splatting 186
208% 265 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 210%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2310 1413 1150 1186 1199 1175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,845
Write 3,548
Mixed 2888
SusWrite 1,406
550% 2,422 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 66.3
210% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,360
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 1,208
847% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 271%
Great: 587%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
703GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2262 2637 1616 1523 1591 1614 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,330
Write 2,616
Mixed 2,383
SusWrite 1,874
519% 2,301 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 57.8
184% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,399
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1,268
938% 1,244 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 320%
Great: 477%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 52.2
Write 101
Mixed 52
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.5
Write 5
Mixed 8.9
15% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 73.7
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 61.7
181% 63.4 GB/s
SC Read 45.4
SC Write 57.7
SC Mixed 49
145% 50.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 171%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 165 27" 1920 1009 SAM71DC LS27AG32x
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback