Today's hottest deals

MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A37
MotherboardMSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '24 at 01:36
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 194
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 397
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 39.2
32% 39.9 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 27.8
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C700 RGB M.2 NVMe SSD 480GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0801L4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 638 678 697 703 450 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 610
Mixed 782
SusWrite 620
188% 848 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 53.9
175% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 276
291% 493 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 174%
Great: 239%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$32
4GB free
Firmware: UF450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 321
Mixed 201
69% 313 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 15.5
56% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 10.1
31% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
113GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 82.4
Write 85.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 69.6
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-36A180Z 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 29.4
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 18.9" 1440 837 DELF037 DELL E1911
Typical B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback