Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '24 at 17:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 420
57% 423 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 50.8
45% 54 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 45.3
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 73 94 61 61 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 435
Write 354
Mixed 158
SusWrite 89.2
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 12.3
48% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 91.7
DQ Write 43.9
DQ Mixed 13.7
25% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$38
736GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 147 145 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 146
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRX2666D464L16S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 23.8" 1920 1017 ACR0743 KA242Y
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback