Today's hottest deals

Medion E6440 MD62800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E6440 MD62800  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION F15KUR
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '24 at 18:36
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 179
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 259
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 233C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6195
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.6
5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 91 70 100 58 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 342
Write 279
Mixed 272
SusWrite 117
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 21.7
82% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 173
124% 159 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
909GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 98 122 127 122 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 4R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 8% 76 62 47 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05C8
Typical E6440 MD62800 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E6440 MD62800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback