Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5 MR9A PRO MAX
Memory120.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '24 at 01:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 682
62% 523 Pts
64-Core 2,502
155% 2,502 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 119
Parallax 124
108% 125 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.1
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 148 212 209 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.6% Average
Read 234
Write 216
Mixed 198
SusWrite 201
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 9
67% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 13.5
43% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 211%
SSD 2TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ZD0R3G0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 408 181 105 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 297
Write 400
Mixed 339
SusWrite 199
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 28.5
102% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 81.8
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 129
114% 163 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 54.7
MC Mixed 52.4
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 140%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 17 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC213 PHL 271V8
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback