Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemANGXUN
MotherboardANGXUN X99-P4
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 16:58
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 645
60% 501 Pts
64-Core 1067
66% 1067 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 39.6
34% 42 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 35.3
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ne-512 2280 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1277 1273 1273 702 64 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,830
Write 1,245
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 776
270% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 47.9
154% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 563
401% 507 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 190%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 20.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 19" 1280 720 GSM4B7A W1934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback