Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 C7M
MotherboardMSI MS-14JK  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221201
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 12:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 63.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 323
94% 182 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 822
89% 707 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
MSI(1462 13E5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 26.6
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 21.3
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,055
Write 1,871
Mixed 1586
409% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 67.3
224% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 892
669% 899 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 332%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
2GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 32.5
Mixed 29.7
67% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.6
200% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 31%
SDXC Card 64GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.7
Write 21.4
Mixed 24.9
33% 28 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
120% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.9" 1536 793 CMN142B
Typical MS-14JK Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-14JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback