Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Sleepy_WC
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 12:16
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 156
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 205
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1357) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2128
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 6
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1014 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 788
Write 1,009
Mixed 939
205% 912 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53
177% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 470
384% 551 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 180%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 2R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 10% 92 87 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical Aspire A315-54 Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback