Today's hottest deals

MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220718
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 12:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$299
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 99.4
1-Core 165
2-Core 323
107% 196 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,067
103% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,461
90% 1,461 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 242
Parallax 404
163% 282 fps
MRender 381
Gravity 166
Splatting 308
234% 285 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 170%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,987
Write 1,140
Mixed 513
265% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58.4
198% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,010
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 593
527% 797 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
127GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 447 433 445 422 390 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 488
Mixed 406
SusWrite 437
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 56.8
185% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 365
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132
7GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 391
Write 466
Mixed 383
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 53.9
176% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 161
178% 299 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 124%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 147 147 148 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 190
Write 159
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 149
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
2% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 32.7
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 38.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 37.5
107% 37.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 3R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 16% 57 98 56 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback