Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 08:00
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 118
45% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 187
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 75.5
46% 62.5 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 43
44% 55.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 144 31 31 43 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 144
Write 95.8
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 81.6
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 10.2
42% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 14
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
73GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 311 182 150 127 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 386
Write 161
Mixed 293
SusWrite 230
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 28.6
109% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 175
131% 175 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 13
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 3R 4G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 22% 95 263 18 60 23.5" 1920 1017 ACI249A ASUS VS247
Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback