Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 07:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 827
83% 674 Pts
64-Core 997
62% 997 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$281
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 123
Parallax 128
111% 129 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 106
Splatting 92.3
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 56 72 57 70 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 474
Write 115
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 64.8
38% 178 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 12.6
56% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 137
122% 191 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
861GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 178
Write 159
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 129
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G3
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback