Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 06:49
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 956
92% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Sapphire(1DA2 426E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 196
Parallax 196
99% 171 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 139
Splatting 92.5
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,526
Write 2,374
Mixed 2,306
536% 2,402 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 94.6
304% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,225
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 98.1
243% 538 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
65GB free
Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 285 183 170 295 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 351
Write 347
Mixed 360
SusWrite 249
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.6
205% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 64.2
83% 153 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 253%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
165GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 119 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 169
Write 157
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 117
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB3K2/32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 36.4
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 21.7" 1920 1057 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback