Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81NX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81NX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 06:31
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 567
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.9
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2 1TB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 1012 1024 1044 1008 552 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,389
Write 1,619
Mixed 1,031
SusWrite 944
280% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 47.5
157% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 511
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 100
149% 287 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 179%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN8991
Typical 81NX Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback