Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 249%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 04:47
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 328
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1,204
111% 929 Pts
64-Core 2,075
128% 2,075 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$727
Asus(1043 88E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
243% Outstanding
Lighting 362
Reflection 470
Parallax 353
295% 395 fps
MRender 466
Gravity 286
Splatting 200
246% 317 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 243%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 394 393 395 409 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 437
Mixed 423
SusWrite 409
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 52.6
170% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 199
153% 210 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3334 3340 3340 3326 3341 3342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 2,804
Write 3,373
Mixed 3,068
SusWrite 3,337
712% 3,145 MB/s
4K Read 79.2
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 108
360% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 1,212
916% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 483%
Great: 508%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 189 190 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 181
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 189
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F83 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback