Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 03:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 236
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 639
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 8
Parallax 6.6
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 108 769 997 384 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,563
Write 1,076
Mixed 989
SusWrite 486
229% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 70.4
235% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 263
286% 479 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 192%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback