Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 02:39
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$182
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 190
2-Core 369
111% 212 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,105
107% 878 Pts
64-Core 1,374
85% 1,374 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$379
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 196
Parallax 214
168% 206 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 169
Splatting 126
149% 191 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,488
Write 2,331
Mixed 1514
469% 2111 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 65.1
267% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1753
DQ Write 1,399
DQ Mixed 1,567
1,175% 1,573 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-5200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 54.2
MC Write 54.5
MC Mixed 53.2
154% 54 GB/s
SC Read 48.4
SC Write 56.2
SC Mixed 53.5
151% 52.7 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 150%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 10 165 27" 2048 1081 MSI3DC0 MSI G273CQ
Typical TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A620M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $489
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback