Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760M C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M C  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display1720 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 02:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$158
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 192
2-Core 357
112% 211 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,091
108% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,630
101% 1,630 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 412B) ≥ 4GB; Windforce OC
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 345
Parallax 260
214% 289 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 228
Splatting 189
199% 252 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 187%
Great: 204%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FPL1000G 1TB
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2485 1048 1056 1054 1064 1059 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 1,602
Write 3,113
Mixed 1,981
SusWrite 1,294
454% 1,997 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 326
4K Mixed 112
421% 169 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 1,176
DQ Mixed 1,477
1,089% 1,442 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 336%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 78.7
MC Write 73.1
MC Mixed 67.8
209% 73.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 31
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 185%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 51% 39 212 56 240 27" 1720 1009 ACR080B XZ270 X
Typical GA-B760M C Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback