Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 01:06
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 56.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 237
76% 142 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 746
72% 593 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia(10DE 17AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.8% Excellent
Lighting 132
Reflection 103
Parallax 125
108% 120 fps
MRender 93.3
Gravity 100
Splatting 0.2
46% 64.7 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 55 82 60 139 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 457
Write 383
Mixed 346
SusWrite 101
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 38.7
146% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 12.8
46% 108 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 91%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
31GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 250 7.1 7.2 6.6 7.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 493
Write 262
Mixed 322
SusWrite 87.9
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 23.2
117% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 39
77% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
257GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 126 122 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 188
Write 183
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 125
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.18278S.00E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 22.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 58%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 180 27" 2560 1369 AUS27EF VG27AQ3A
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback