Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 01:06
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 640
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 160
Parallax 164
131% 162 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 155
Splatting 125
124% 156 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 150
Write 174
Mixed 125
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 15.3
57% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 74.5
79% 139 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$393
373GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 226 232 220 227 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Good
Read 212
Write 208
Mixed 200
SusWrite 225
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 26.6
94% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 60%
Great: 131%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
315GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 415 434 396 407 409 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 342
Mixed 349
SusWrite 411
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 31.7
104% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1312 125 60 27" 1280 720 DEL422F DELL U2722D
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $842
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback