Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 01:00
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 151
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 276
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 18.4
15% 18.1 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.7
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,524
Write 5,154
Mixed 5,316
1,260% 5,665 MB/s
4K Read 163
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 123
469% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 506
414% 603 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
153GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 408 418 284 284 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 461
Mixed 392
SusWrite 348
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 52.3
166% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
175GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 133 130 125 113 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
78% Very good
Read 145
Write 154
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 126
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF V23D4LF4GB5282682133 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0750 VG240Y S
Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 2,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback