Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 00:54
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 269
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 920
87% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 204
Parallax 242
181% 223 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 219
Splatting 171
174% 219 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$46
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,326
Write 2,192
Mixed 1,668
459% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 67.8
218% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 818
604% 802 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
124GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 467 472 468 468 470 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 476
Mixed 453
SusWrite 465
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 46.9
155% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 176 190 185 186 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 28 144 26.9" 1280 720 LEN65BF LEN Y27fA
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $365

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback