Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 00:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$163
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 166
2-Core 330
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,085
102% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,481
92% 1,481 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 34.8
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 22.6
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 832 557 309 151 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,164
Write 1,248
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 532
228% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 63.2
225% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,171
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 983
749% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 194%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 29.5
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0934 XF243Y
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $709
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback