Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 21JUS1J400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21JUS1J400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21JUS1J400
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240123
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 00:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 196
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 1,000
82% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.10.24.05
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 28.7
7% 18.3 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 21.7
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 800 1TB
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 995 1030 1121 907 805 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,010
Write 1,154
Mixed 1,059
SusWrite 984
238% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 36.9
120% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 535
371% 471 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 157%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 122 56 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback