Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 00:00
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 363
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.34
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.9% Good
Lighting 84.8
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 73.4
69% 82.1 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 70.5
57% 68.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 134 112 97 94 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 841
Write 300
Mixed 350
SusWrite 133
89% 406 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 30.7
110% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 461
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 276
223% 321 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 164%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
666GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 155 165 172 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 166
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 163
93% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 24" 1280 720 ACR0ADD K243Y H
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback