Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory49.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 23:26
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 67.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,105
99% 837 Pts
64-Core 2,145
133% 2,145 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 177
Parallax 170
131% 169 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 167
Splatting 117
111% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$105
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 949 980 974 950 949 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,508
Write 1,076
Mixed 1,033
SusWrite 969
308% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 64.8
246% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,078
760% 944 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 274%
Great: 429%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
165GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 277 277 275 276 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 488
Mixed 369
SusWrite 294
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.4
198% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 234
188% 259 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 118%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$266
696GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 125 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 124
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
26GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 62 61 60 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 60
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
446GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 96 98 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 74.7
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 95.4
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 25.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ78D5 BenQ GL2760
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback