Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 23:00
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 265
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 813
81% 658 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13FC) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 6
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 0.9
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1261 712 291 155 126 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,451
Write 1,188
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 448
240% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 61.3
201% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 527
395% 543 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 173%
Great: 253%
Nvme KINGSTON SKC3000S1024G 1TB
81GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 1341 780 756 759 687 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,629
Write 1374
Mixed 1,524
SusWrite 950
308% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 60.8
192% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 594
440% 595 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 210%
Great: 609%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 30.5
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 18.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback