Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 20:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 497
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 353D) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 52.5
33% 43.8 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 40.7
38% 47.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 90 89 87 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 132
Write 102
Mixed 116
SusWrite 85.1
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 20.4
77% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 41.4
52% 93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
928GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 118 116 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 114
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23D2 ASUS VS239
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback