Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 19:06
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 193
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 314
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 58
Parallax 77.8
52% 66.4 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 41.2
45% 57.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 48 52 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 399
Write 176
Mixed 274
SusWrite 77
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 26.8
102% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 162
151% 231 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 88F2 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 13 60 27" 1280 720 ACR02CA S271HL
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback