Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A5 K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A5 K1  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 16:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 305
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 916
93% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 50F5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 28.2
16% 23 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 20.3
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GTLCW-E6GBTNB4 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 344 338 342 346 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,485
Write 1,430
Mixed 1360
SusWrite 350
259% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 51
168% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 710
495% 638 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 160%
Great: 343%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 28.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08B3
Typical GA-A5 K1 Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A5 K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback