Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag 1220615;1470148

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag 1220615;1470148  (all builds)
MotherboardEA A35
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 16:10
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8200Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 95
49% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 129
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Device(1BAB 591C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 3.8
4% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X232112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 272 266 279 283 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 418
Write 245
Mixed 191
SusWrite 269
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 22
91% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 116
118% 193 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE0779
Typical 1220615;1470148 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag 1220615;1470148

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback