PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (all builds) |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191218 |
Uptime | 6.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '24 at 15:57 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
79.8%
Very good
|
82% 153 Pts
|
78% 641 Pts
|
70% 1,133 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
90.4%
Outstanding
|
85% 121 fps
|
100% 126 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$46
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 434 426 417 418 424 MB/s
|
169%
Outstanding
|
169% 760 MB/s
|
152% 50.3 MB/s
|
759% 1,018 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 158 156 155 162 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
44% 197 MB/s
|
94% 41.8 MB/s
|
142% 210 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 212 210 211 213 211 MB/s
|
||||
![]() WD Green 2TB (2012)-$29
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 77 76 75 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
212% 1.57 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
59.6%
Above average
|
63% 22.1 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25% | 33% | 27 | 213 | 58 | 144 | 24" | 1280 720 | ACI24A4 VG248 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $90Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 2,727x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,496x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 1,045x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 783x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $281Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 579x |
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 558x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 133% - Outstanding | Total price: $294 |