Today's hottest deals

Asus X555BP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555BP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555BP
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190513
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 15:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 89.8
40% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 89.7
8-Core 92.4
12% 91.1 Pts
64-Core 89.5
6% 89.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 13D0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5.6
3% 4.97 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 193 85 62 69 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64% Good
Read 413
Write 200
Mixed 311
SusWrite 104
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 29.7
110% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 153
117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A4G085WE-BCPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06A4
Typical X555BP Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555BP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback