Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 14:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 248
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 617
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1432) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.5762
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 22.4
16% 21.6 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 0.7
5% 7.03 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 822 854 261 374 820 388 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 918
Mixed 815
SusWrite 586
204% 917 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 70.8
251% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 340
323% 489 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 192%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 18.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 16.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback